|

Hanging
Haman: The Commandment
to
Wipe-Out Amalek
On the Shabbat before Purim, generally known as Shabbat Parashat
Zachor, Jews across the world gather in their synagogues to hear
Deuteronomy 25:17-19 read at the end of Torah reading:
Remember what Amalek did to you on the way when you went out of
Egypt. That they encountered you on the way, and struck the hindmost,
all that were weak at the
rear; and they did not fear G-d. Therefore it will be, when the
Eternal, your G-d, gives you relief from all your enemies, all
around, in the land that the Eternal, your G-d, is giving to you
as an inheritance to possess it, then you shall wipe out the remembrance
of Amalek
from beneath the heavens; you must not forget.
What
must the Children of Israel remember? Deuteronomy 25:17 refers to
an incident in Exodus 17:8-16, just after the Children of Israel
crossed the Reed/Red Sea. On their third day out of Egypt, as they
traveled in the wilderness, the army of Amalek swooped down from
behind them, attacking the old and the weak who were straggling
at the rear. The commandment to remember Amalek, however, is more
than just remembering that Amalek attacked the Jews in the wilderness,
it is remembering that they are the very antithesis of Israel.
Parashat
Zachor is read on the Shabbat before Purim because Haman is a direct
descendant of Amalek. Like his forefathers, Haman was the archenemy
of the Jews. He wanted to entirely wipe out the Jewish nation. Neither
begging, bribery nor conversion would have changed Haman's mind
because he recognized that the Jewish nation itself represented
a spiritual force which he abhorred.
To
understand Haman's motives and the commandment of Zachor, it is
necessary to first learn the history of Amalek:
Esav's Successor
- Initially, Amalek was an actual person who later became the leader
of a clan, which became a nation of the same name. Amalek was a
grandson of Jacob's brother Esav.
In Genesis 36:12, the Torah introduces Amalek:
Now Timna was concubine to Elifaz, son of Esav, and she bore Amalek
to Elifaz.
We later learn (Genesis 36:22) that Timna was the sister of Lotan
who was a chieftain of the land of Seir where Esav went to live.
Thus we see that Amalek was the scion of two powerful families,
yet he was only a concubine's son.
The Sages tell us that Amalek was raised in the tents of Esav, constantly
hearing his grandfather bemoan his fate and how Esav's brother,
Jacob, had stolen his birthright (See Genesis 25).
Amalek absorbed Esav's hatred of the children of Jacob, thus it
became the nature of the nation of Amalek to hate the Jews.
Amalek versus the Children of Israel
Exodus 17:8-16 - As noted above, three days after the crossing of
the Reed/Red Sea, the Amalekites traveled many miles in order to
attack the Jewish people from behind, attacking the weak and the
stragglers. The Jewish people miraculously defeated the Amalekites
in a one day war. This battle was significant because it showed
the true nature of the Amalekites. G-d had just performed miracle
after miracle, from the 10 plagues to the splitting of the sea,
and not a single nation dared to attack Israel except Amalek. Lest
one believe that Amalek was courageous, it should be noted that
they did not risk a frontal attack.
Every nation has certain outstanding character traits. Amalek is
known for its all consuming love of self and reliance on violence
to prove its superiority.
The Sages teach that Amalek never denied the existence of G-d or
G-d's special relationship with the Jewish people. The Amalekites
just didn't care. In fact, their very understanding of G-d and His
relationship with the Israelites was precisely why they felt the
need to attack--Amalek clearly resented the existence of an opposing
authority.
Amalek saw that no other nation dared to attack the Children of
Israel and that the Jews had demonstrated that there can be power
in peace. This went against the entire mind-set of the Amalekites,
who preached and practiced the ideology that might makes right."
Amalek versus the Kingdom of Israel: Samuel
I, Chapter 15
Not long after the unified Kingdom of Israel was formed under the
reign of King Saul, the king, at the direction of the prophet Samuel,
gathered his troops to fulfill the Biblical commandment to wipe
out Amalek.
King Saul was a mighty warrior and was victorious over Amalek, virtually
destroying the nation. But, "he took Agag, the king of Amalek
alive...and Saul and the people had pity on Agag the king of Amalek,"
and on the Amalekite flocks and cattle (Samuel I 15:8-9).
By having mercy on Agag, Saul went against the specific directive
of
G-d, who was, needless to say, less than pleased.
The prophet Samuel rose early the very next morning, came to Saul
and informed him that G-d was angered by his taking Amalekite sheep
and cattle for spoils and for not fulfilling the commandment to
utterly destroy Amalek.
After a brief and futile denial by Saul, the king admitted his transgression
and Samuel ordered Agag brought to him. The prophet proceeded to
kill the king of Amalek and concluded the matter.
The damage, however, was already done. In that one night, our sages
teach us, Agag had relations with a maidservant (or his wife) who
later, gave birth to a son. Thus, over a thousand years later the
Jews were faced with mortal danger from Haman the Agagite.
It is interesting to note that just as Haman is a direct descendant
of Agag, both Mordechai and Esther are descendants of Saul.
Why Amalek and Israel are in opposition, and
how this relates to Haman:
The Talmud tells us that the wording in Deuteronomy 25:18, "asher
kar'cha ba'derech" literally means that Amalek "happened"
upon the Jews. This, the rabbis explain, is an explanation of the
personality of Amalek: Amalek represents the philosophy of chance,
of the haphazard dictates of "fate" and "destiny,"
which oppose the Jewish philosophy of Divine control. Amalek philosophy
negates the concept that there is a purpose to humanity or to creation
itself--again the antithesis of Jewish philosophy.
The difference in philosophy between Amalek and Israel can be seen
all the way back to the time of the nations' forefathers, Esav and
Jacob.
Esav was a hunter, he lived his life for the thrill of the game,
the risk of danger and for moment-to-moment pleasure. Life had no
particular purpose in Esav's mind, which is demonstrated in his
desire for Jacob's lentils and his preparedness to sell his birthright.
Esav easily parts with his birthright as first born (which would
have given him the rights to the Land of Israel) merely because
he was hungry at that very moment. When he gave the birthright away,
he mocked Jacob's desire for it by asking "What is the birthright
to me?" (Genesis 25:27-34).
Jacob, on the other hand, planned for the future. He studied and
tried to find the best way to serve G-d. For this reason, G-d communicated
with him and made him the father of the twelve tribes, the future
Nation of Israel.
Amalek's attack on the Jews after they crossed the Red(Reed) Sea
was motivated by this hatred of the Israelite belief in the Divine
hand of G-d. Certainly Amalek, and the entire world, had heard of
the great plagues that had struck Egypt, but they found reasons
to scoff at these phenomenal events. While no other nation would
dare attack the Jews with the cloud of G-d surrounding them, Amalek
needed to attack in order to show that "might makes right"
was still the natural order of the world. While they did not win
in their battle with Israel, they certainly diminished the fear
of the other nations for the Jewish people. The Midrash describes
it as if the Amalekites cooled a hot bath, scorching themselves,
but encouraging others to enter.
Haman
Haman's attempt to destroy the Jewish people is a direct result
of the historical and philosophical battles of Amalek and Israel.
As a descendent of Agag, King of Amalek, Haman is strikingly aware
of the Jewish victories over Amalek, both in the wilderness and
in the time of King Saul, as definitively recorded in Jewish texts.
His desire to wipe out the Jews as a nation was a direct result
of this historical battle between nations.
Haman's conflict with Mordechai, however, was based on the philosophical
differences of the two nations. Just as in the days in the wilderness,
Mordechai (the Jews) stood as a symbol of Jewish strength and as
a symbol of the Divine hand active in the world. As Haman himself
points out to King Achashverosh, no other nation was so scattered,
yet remained unified. And Mordechai defied Haman's assertions of
might makes right by refusing to bow to him just because he was
Prime Minister. While the king of the land may have commanded all
to bow to Haman, the King of the Universe commanded all to bow to
no one but Him. Throughout the Megillah there is an underlying struggle
of Haman trying to show that he controls his own destiny, and the
destiny of the empire, only to be foiled by the subtle plans of
G-d.
Fighting Amalek today
While
we do not know who the descendants of Amalek are today, the sages
teach that a part of Amalek can also be found in each of us--our
natural inclination to do wrong. Every person must constantly fight
the Amalek in his/herself which tends to rationalize their actions:
For example, lashon harah, speaking evil or gossiping, can destroy
another person, yet we constantly justify our gossiping by saying
that our juicy tidbit must already be common knowledge or it is
important that the other person know that Suzie was out with Joey.
On a more personal level, for the modern day Jew, fighting Amalek
may mean battling our own inclinations and remembering that G-d
is always there and surely runs the world for our benefit.
|